Posts by htsyl

Car Accident? Talk To Your Lawyer About This!

By htsyl, 10 December, 2009, No Comment

Well, I learned something today. People who know me will tell you that it’s hard to admit that there is something that I don’t know, but they will also tell you that I believe you can learn lessons even from people or experiences you don’t like. So, I’m sharing my lesson of the day with you, even though I’m not that happy to admit I hadn’t known about it before…

Car accidents and lawyers go hand in hand. This must be true or they wouldn’t be advertising on TV all the time that you must call them when you have a car accident, have injuries, and the accident was NOT YOUR FAULT! These are personal injury attorneys. They are particularly interested in your medical (or emotional) injuries resulting from the accident, and not all that concerned with the damage to your car. The damage to your car is called property damage. The personal injury attorney may tell you that they will “assist” you with obtaining the property damage settlement for your car, but they usually don’t make any money on that claim, so are not all that interested in it. The usual procedure is that you get an estimate of the damage to your car either from a body shop or the insurance company and they agree to pay you (or the body shop) the exact amount of the repairs. If your car is totaled, you have a whole different problem on your hands, especially if you have a loan on the car that won’t be paid off by the amount the insurance company wants to pay (but that is another discussion — not part of today’s lesson learned).

There are two things to be aware of when dealing with the car repair. First, if the insurance company sends someone to do an estimate of the repairs on your car (usually the insurance company for the person at fault, not your insurance company), they will give you the written estimate on the spot and ask you if you want to get the car repaired or just want the money. You may be tempted to take the money and not get the car fixed. However, the estimate done by the guilty party’s adjuster may be too low. This can happen for a couple of reasons. First, they may not be able to see all the actual damage to the car because they don’t have it up on a rack. Just as likely (or more likely, if you’ve gotten a taste for my point of view) is that they are hoping you will just want the money and settle for the amount which turns out not to be enough. I had this happen recently — the adjuster gave me an estimate for repair on a rear-end collision. When I actually took the car to MY body shop, they found additional damage. The body shop contacted the insurance company and got the additional money for the repair.

The second thing to beware of is my life lesson of the day. Some day after you have the car accident and have your car repaired, you will want to trade in or sell your car. It may actually be that there was very little damage to your car in the accident — at least not major damage to the frame. However, because your accident was reported to the police, the accident is reported to CarFax. CarFax is that great Internet resource where you can get history about any car you may be looking to purchase and a great way (theoretically) to make sure you are not buying a car that has suffered major body damage. HOWEVER, I learned today that if your car is reported to CarFax as having been in an accident, it will suffer from a loss in future value, even if there was no major damage to your car. The simple fact that your car was involved in an accident, no matter how minor, will lower the future value of your car.

I am not exactly sure how your lawyer is going to deal with this problem, but there is more to your property damage claim than the actual repairs. It may be possible to get an affidavit from a reputable car dealer about how the Kelley Blue Book value of your car will be affected by the Negative CarFax info on your car. In my humble opinion, you should get some additional property damage settlement in addition to the repairs. Since this isn’t typically the kind of thing that personal injury attorneys like to take up their time doing, you may have a challenge on your hands. However, remember, once you agree to settle the property damage claim on your vehicle, there is no going back. It’s a done deal. Your personal injury claim is a completely different case and is settled separately.

Just in case you are wondering how I learned this lesson today – took a nice little convertible sports car in to the dealer to sell. It’s in perfect condition, low mileage, a beauty. They wouldn’t buy it from me because it had a negative CarFax report (the car was literally bumped in an accident 2 years ago, but since the vehicle was on the police report, it made it to CarFax). There were no actual repairs needed to the car — our body shop buffed out the mark on the bumper at no charge. But now, 2 years later, the car is difficult to sell and worth about $6,000 less than it would be, minus the CarFax “ding.” Expensive lesson.

  • Share/Bookmark

Sue Your Lawyer – Two Lawsuits in One

By htsyl, 7 December, 2009, No Comment

Suing your lawyer is a very tricky business, which is why, in the best of all worlds, you won’t find yourself in that situation. You’ll be a smart consumer of legal services and won’t let things get out of control with your lawyer before it’s too late. It’s no accident that lawyers tend to make all the rules and that suing them can become something of a Catch-22. Here’s the problem. When you sue your lawyer for malpractice, you have to have damages – money damages. The lawyer has to have done something wrong that cost you a lot of money that would have been yours if the lawyer hadn’t screwed up. So, when you file a lawsuit against your attorney, you have to prove two separate cases at once.

First, you have to prove that the attorney did something wrong, i.e., committed legal malpractice. We’ll discuss this more later — the fact that legal malpractice is not the same as being unethical. But, for the sake of the argument today, let’s assume that your lawyer committed malpractice. After you’ve found another lawyer to sue the first lawyer, you will also have to prove that the original case that you had with the bad attorney was a good case and you would have won that case, except for the fact that the attorney committed malpractice.

Think about this for a minute. You sue your lawyer for malpractice in a case where you were suing someone else. Presumably, when you hired the first lawyer, they told you that you had a good case. No attorney is supposed to give you any kind of guarantee that you will win (that would be unethical), but they shouldn’t let you retain their services if, in their professional opinion, you don’t “have a case.” Then things go wrong with the first attorney, you sue him (or her), and their defense is that you don’t have any (money) damages because you never would have prevailed (won) in the original case. In other words, your offense becomes their defense…go figure!

To be continued…

  • Share/Bookmark

Bad Lawyers Happen – Chapter 1

By htsyl, 1 December, 2009, No Comment

What fun would this blog be without some bad lawyer stories?  I can dish out common sense all day, every day, but a bad lawyer tale once in a while is a must. I’m going to share real stories, without real names or locations (I don’t want to get sued by a good or bad lawyer). I can assure you, however, that these are real situations that happened to real everyday people.

Rebecca was in a car accident that was not her fault. Her car was damaged and she had some injuries requiring medical care. She found a lawyer by looking in the phone book and retained Lawyer X, who advertised as a personal injury attorney. She continued to receive medical treatment and signed papers that allowed her medical providers to have a lien on the legal case. This meant that she could receive medical care without paying up front and the medical provider would get their bills paid by the attorney when the case was either settled or won in court.

Quite a bit of time passed and Lawyer X was not communicating anything to Rebecca about her case. Her medical providers were starting to pester her about her medical bills because they were not able to communicate with Lawyer X.  Finally, Rebecca was told by her attorney that the case was going to trial. She was to meet her lawyer on the courthouse steps in a few days.  When she met her lawyer at the courthouse, he informed her that the case had been settled for $30,000.  He had never told Rebecca that there was an offer to settle or talked to her about agreeing to a settlement.

Time passed. Rebecca didn’t hear from her attorney again. She could not reach him by phone. She never received any money. Her medical providers were hounding her for payment. She went to see a lawyer about her Bad Lawyer. Turned out that Lawyer X did not have malpractice insurance, had placed all his assets in his wife’s name, and was essentially “judgment-proof.” The $30,000 check he had received from the insurance company to “settle” her case had been cashed and spent. Rebecca ended up declaring bankruptcy.

This is just one example of why “suing your lawyer” will not necessarily solve a problem with a bad lawyer. If Rebecca had been armed with information and understood more about the legal process and what her attorney should have been doing for her, this outcome might have been preventable.

And that is why I keep dishing out common sense.

  • Share/Bookmark